Retire Rich

June 25, 2007

For 401(k)s, Too Safe Can Sometimes Lead to Sorry

Score one for the mutual fund industry.

It isn't every day that two influential consumer groups, the Consumer Federation of America and Fund Democracy, rally to the industry's support. But that's precisely what happened last Monday when they fired off a letter to the Office of Management and Budget, urging it to ignore protestations from the insurance industry to extend default 401(k) options the Department of Labor has proposed.

In response to the Pension Protection Act, which encourages employers to automatically steer new employees who fail to sign up for a 401(k) into default choices, the DOL has suggested balanced and target-date funds. But the American Council of Life Insurers wants the defaults to also include stable-value funds, money market funds, guaranteed investment contracts and other types of capital preservation funds. It's no wonder the insurance industry is going to the mattresses on this. Stable-value funds accounted for 13%, or $400 billion, of 401(k) investments in 2005, according to data from the Employee Benefit Research Institute and the Stable Value Investment Association.

In their letter to the OMB last Monday, in which the Consumer Federation and Fund Democracy ask the OMB to support the DOL, the two groups call permitting stable-value funds a "mattress mentality" and the insurance industry's support of them a "self-interested argument."

Citing data from the ICI, the two groups reason that a person who begins investing in a target-date fund at age 30 would have an account twice as big by the time they retire than if they had invested in a stable-value fund.

"It is widely accepted that, if capital preservation vehicles are included as qualified default investments, they will be adopted by far too many employers and will attract a disproportionate percentage of retirement assets," the groups wrote. "Why should an employer take greater litigation risk on a default option such as a lifecycle fund that may lose money in the short term when it can enjoy a liability safe harbor with a capital preservation investment? Their employees will be worse off, but their litigation exposure will be materially reduced.

"This is precisely why such a large percentage of plan sponsors have used capital preservation funds as default options. In short, including stable value as default options would leave millions of Americans poorer during their retirement years."

Certainly, I would agree that the default options the DOL is proposing are far better choices.

(c) 2007 Money Management Executive and SourceMedia, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

http://www.mmexecutive.com http://www.sourcemedia.com

Recent Posts

Tear a Page From the AARP/Today Show Playbook

America has yet to witness the tremendous societal transformation retiring Boomers will have, as the oldest is a mere 64 and the youngest, 46. But we are beginning to see signs of the tsunami-sized impact this army of 77 million will have on the workplace, the economy, healthcare and even the arts and entertainment. AARP has just formed a timely, unbelievably beneficial partnership with NBC's "Today Show." Beginning tomorrow, March 9, the No. 1 morning news program that reaches 5.9 million viewers a day, is bringing back former Emmy Award-winning host Jane Pauley to produce and report a monthly segment called, "Your Life Calling."

It's About Time for an About-Face for Funds

It's about time mutual fund product developers thought out of the Morningstar investment-style box to give portfolio managers the ability to do an about-face.

One of the most critical discussions to come out of the financial crisis has been the questioning of the rigid investment mandates of mutual funds and the soundness of 60-year-old modern portfolio theory-since correlations between investment classes are obviously becoming more intricately woven in the global economy of the 21st century and the markets are prone to increasingly higher volatility and risk.

Extreme Makeover: 401(k) Edition

Investors are about to test drive 401(k) plans with a 21st Century whole new look and feel. The Department of Labor is promising streamlined rules for 401(k) advice that plan sponsors may actually use. The government is looking into the possibility of offering annuities or other lifetime income options in defined contribution plans.

C- Grade is Nothing To Crow About for 401(k)s

The mutual fund industry should proudly celebrate Americans' 73% approval rating for 401(k)s, according to an Investment Company Institute report, "Enduring Confidence in the 401(k) System." In our book, a 73% rating equals a C- grade that, in fact, should be a wake-up call for the industry to do a far better job of equipping Americans to adequately prepare for a decent and healthy life in their old age.

Index of Posts

0 Comments

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Money Management Executive, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

Not Registered?

You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.