Retire Rich

June 25, 2007

For 401(k)s, Too Safe Can Sometimes Lead to Sorry

Score one for the mutual fund industry.

It isn't every day that two influential consumer groups, the Consumer Federation of America and Fund Democracy, rally to the industry's support. But that's precisely what happened last Monday when they fired off a letter to the Office of Management and Budget, urging it to ignore protestations from the insurance industry to extend default 401(k) options the Department of Labor has proposed.

In response to the Pension Protection Act, which encourages employers to automatically steer new employees who fail to sign up for a 401(k) into default choices, the DOL has suggested balanced and target-date funds. But the American Council of Life Insurers wants the defaults to also include stable-value funds, money market funds, guaranteed investment contracts and other types of capital preservation funds. It's no wonder the insurance industry is going to the mattresses on this. Stable-value funds accounted for 13%, or $400 billion, of 401(k) investments in 2005, according to data from the Employee Benefit Research Institute and the Stable Value Investment Association.

In their letter to the OMB last Monday, in which the Consumer Federation and Fund Democracy ask the OMB to support the DOL, the two groups call permitting stable-value funds a "mattress mentality" and the insurance industry's support of them a "self-interested argument."

Citing data from the ICI, the two groups reason that a person who begins investing in a target-date fund at age 30 would have an account twice as big by the time they retire than if they had invested in a stable-value fund.

"It is widely accepted that, if capital preservation vehicles are included as qualified default investments, they will be adopted by far too many employers and will attract a disproportionate percentage of retirement assets," the groups wrote. "Why should an employer take greater litigation risk on a default option such as a lifecycle fund that may lose money in the short term when it can enjoy a liability safe harbor with a capital preservation investment? Their employees will be worse off, but their litigation exposure will be materially reduced.

"This is precisely why such a large percentage of plan sponsors have used capital preservation funds as default options. In short, including stable value as default options would leave millions of Americans poorer during their retirement years."

Certainly, I would agree that the default options the DOL is proposing are far better choices.

(c) 2007 Money Management Executive and SourceMedia, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

http://www.mmexecutive.com http://www.sourcemedia.com

Recent Posts

Mutual Funds Must Go High-Tech-v. 3.0

Over the last number of years, mutual fund transfer agencies and shareholder communications companies have tried to convince shareholders to accept paperless summary prospectuses, proxies, trade confirmations and electronically stamped signatures. Fund supermarkets and web home pages have broadened their horizons to include market commentary, videostreaming and personal financial news. At the same time, exchange-traded funds, funds-of-funds, hedge FoFs, unified managed accounts, target dates, 401(k) auto enrollment and heightened awareness among people throughout the country of the difficulties of being retired-have taken off.

Test of the Massey Mine

Fund giant boards of directors at AllianceBernstein, American Funds, Fidelity, Vanguard and others are reportedly starting to bring about meaningful change in the corporations in which they are invested. Proof should come any day now, when the shareholder proxy votes from the annual meetings are released. Fund chief executive officers spoke about the power and influence their proxies wield in an interesting Reuters article last week, "Mutual Funds Seek to Shed 'Rubber Stamp' Tag."

Milestones

In 2011, 401(k) plans will turn 30, but the milestones the mutual fund industry has reached in this time are but a nanosecond in the history of U.S. retirement policy. Executives we interviewed for this special edition of Money Management Executive for the Investment Company Institute's meeting in Washington, speak to important milestones of the recent past and into the future. Look inside for observations and forecasts by Ted Benna, Robert L. Reynolds, Dan Fuss, David C. John, Steven Miyao and others.

At Age 30, It's Time for a Revamping for the 401(k)

This year marks the 30th anniversary of the 401(k), the revolutionary retirement savings vehicle that has been annihilating pension plans, empowering individuals to take part in the stock market-and, sadly, that left retirees with the misfortune of leaving the workforce in 2000 or 2008 very badly off. The cracks in the system are prompting many asset managers, regulators and retirement experts to take a hard look at 401(k)s and how they can be fixed.

Index of Posts

0 Comments

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Money Management Executive, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

Not Registered?

You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.