Sign up today and take advantage of member-only content — the kind of timely, cutting edge industry insight that only Money Management Executive can deliver.
  • Exclusive Online Only Content
  • Free Daily Email News Alerts
  • Asset Management Blogs

Retire Rich

By Lee Barney, MMExecutive

June 25, 2007

For 401(k)s, Too Safe Can Sometimes Lead to Sorry

Score one for the mutual fund industry.

It isn't every day that two influential consumer groups, the Consumer Federation of America and Fund Democracy, rally to the industry's support. But that's precisely what happened last Monday when they fired off a letter to the Office of Management and Budget, urging it to ignore protestations from the insurance industry to extend default 401(k) options the Department of Labor has proposed.

In response to the Pension Protection Act, which encourages employers to automatically steer new employees who fail to sign up for a 401(k) into default choices, the DOL has suggested balanced and target-date funds. But the American Council of Life Insurers wants the defaults to also include stable-value funds, money market funds, guaranteed investment contracts and other types of capital preservation funds. It's no wonder the insurance industry is going to the mattresses on this. Stable-value funds accounted for 13%, or $400 billion, of 401(k) investments in 2005, according to data from the Employee Benefit Research Institute and the Stable Value Investment Association.

In their letter to the OMB last Monday, in which the Consumer Federation and Fund Democracy ask the OMB to support the DOL, the two groups call permitting stable-value funds a "mattress mentality" and the insurance industry's support of them a "self-interested argument."

Citing data from the ICI, the two groups reason that a person who begins investing in a target-date fund at age 30 would have an account twice as big by the time they retire than if they had invested in a stable-value fund.

"It is widely accepted that, if capital preservation vehicles are included as qualified default investments, they will be adopted by far too many employers and will attract a disproportionate percentage of retirement assets," the groups wrote. "Why should an employer take greater litigation risk on a default option such as a lifecycle fund that may lose money in the short term when it can enjoy a liability safe harbor with a capital preservation investment? Their employees will be worse off, but their litigation exposure will be materially reduced.

"This is precisely why such a large percentage of plan sponsors have used capital preservation funds as default options. In short, including stable value as default options would leave millions of Americans poorer during their retirement years."

Certainly, I would agree that the default options the DOL is proposing are far better choices.

(c) 2007 Money Management Executive and SourceMedia, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

http://www.mmexecutive.com http://www.sourcemedia.com

Recent Posts

Give Control Back to Fund Managers

Finally, insiders launched candid criticism at the mutual fund industry last week, to help it respond sensibly to the economic meltdown and reposition itself to regain investor trust.Foremost among this advice is giving portfolio managers back the power to pick stocks and run with their investment ideas, instead of being so tightly tethered to an investment class and market capitalization. Further, fund managers should step away from their style boxes and take a look at bigger economic trends.

401(k)s Will Supplant Pensions in Our Lifetimes

How far the 401(k) has come since employers first introduced the savings plan in 1981. And how far it has yet to go. 401(k)s, I predict, will become universal in our lifetimes, supplanting all forms of pension plans. The first time I heard about 401(k)s, when I entered the workforce in 1982, was from a fellow classmate from the University of Pennsylvania, who was familiar with then-esoteric 401(k) section of the IRS code (then being touted merely as a tax benefit), since she worked as an accountant for Coopers & Lybrand.

Index of Posts

Post a Comment

You must be registered and logged in to post a comment. Click here to register.

Reader Comments

Be the first to comment.

Lee Barney

Lee Barney has been the editor of Money Management Executive since 2002 and has been writing about Wall Street since 1993. Previously, at United Media’s Wall Street & Technology magazine and Risk/Waters Information Services, she covered financial IT. For TheStreet.com, she wrote the daily “Meet the Street” column covering a broad spectrum of market-moving events. Lee began her career as a reporter in Tokyo with The Japan Times and was executive editor of Spotlight magazine.

Related Items