Retire Rich

July 23, 2007

AIM Investments Revamps Proxy Voting Guidelines

We've got to hand it to the board of directors at AIM Investments for acting responsibly and in direct response to a profound change in public sentiment.

Reacting to accusations by a labor group that it is one of the most egregious fund companies when it comes to voting in line with management, particularly on executive pay, AIM's board set up a proxy voting committee last year to overhaul its policies.

We've said before that it will take some time for special-interest groups and the public to begin to scrutinize the proxy voting records that the Securities and Exchange Commission began requiring fund companies to make public in 2003-but that such scrutiny is inevitable.

The early results of AIM's 2007 corporate election proxy voting records appear to indicate the changes have made a real and significant difference. Of the roughly 1,000 votes AIM cast, it voted against management recommendations at least once 45% of the time, and against all of management recommendations, 15% of the time.

"There was a sense that the process was routine as opposed to being vigilant," Bruce Crockett, chairman of the AIM Funds board told The Wall Street Journal.

"There was also concern that shareholders were becoming more vigilant about corporate governance, so something had to be done. The policies needed to be completely reworked from top to bottom," added Donna Anderson, chairwoman of the proxy voting committee.

As a result of the changes, AIM is now scrutinizing severance packages and executive pay more closely and voting more often against staggered boards as opposed to voting in completely new slates every year.

The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, in conjunction with The Corporate Library, examined the 2006 proxy voting records on executive pay measures for 29 mutual fund families and concluded that AIM, AllianceBernstein and Barclays Global Investors were "pay enablers." The study found that while the fund companies voted in favor of management-proposed executive compensation recommendations 74% of the time-AIM voted in support of such proposals 91.1% of the time.

We've said it before and we'll undoubtedly say it again: The day of proxy vote reckoning has finally come.

(c) 2007 Money Management Executive and SourceMedia, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

http://www.mmexecutive.com http://www.sourcemedia.com

Recent Posts

Tear a Page From the AARP/Today Show Playbook

America has yet to witness the tremendous societal transformation retiring Boomers will have, as the oldest is a mere 64 and the youngest, 46. But we are beginning to see signs of the tsunami-sized impact this army of 77 million will have on the workplace, the economy, healthcare and even the arts and entertainment. AARP has just formed a timely, unbelievably beneficial partnership with NBC's "Today Show." Beginning tomorrow, March 9, the No. 1 morning news program that reaches 5.9 million viewers a day, is bringing back former Emmy Award-winning host Jane Pauley to produce and report a monthly segment called, "Your Life Calling."

It's About Time for an About-Face for Funds

It's about time mutual fund product developers thought out of the Morningstar investment-style box to give portfolio managers the ability to do an about-face.

One of the most critical discussions to come out of the financial crisis has been the questioning of the rigid investment mandates of mutual funds and the soundness of 60-year-old modern portfolio theory-since correlations between investment classes are obviously becoming more intricately woven in the global economy of the 21st century and the markets are prone to increasingly higher volatility and risk.

Extreme Makeover: 401(k) Edition

Investors are about to test drive 401(k) plans with a 21st Century whole new look and feel. The Department of Labor is promising streamlined rules for 401(k) advice that plan sponsors may actually use. The government is looking into the possibility of offering annuities or other lifetime income options in defined contribution plans.

C- Grade is Nothing To Crow About for 401(k)s

The mutual fund industry should proudly celebrate Americans' 73% approval rating for 401(k)s, according to an Investment Company Institute report, "Enduring Confidence in the 401(k) System." In our book, a 73% rating equals a C- grade that, in fact, should be a wake-up call for the industry to do a far better job of equipping Americans to adequately prepare for a decent and healthy life in their old age.

Index of Posts

0 Comments

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Money Management Executive, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

Not Registered?

You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.