Retire Rich

July 23, 2007

AIM Investments Revamps Proxy Voting Guidelines

We've got to hand it to the board of directors at AIM Investments for acting responsibly and in direct response to a profound change in public sentiment.

Reacting to accusations by a labor group that it is one of the most egregious fund companies when it comes to voting in line with management, particularly on executive pay, AIM's board set up a proxy voting committee last year to overhaul its policies.

We've said before that it will take some time for special-interest groups and the public to begin to scrutinize the proxy voting records that the Securities and Exchange Commission began requiring fund companies to make public in 2003-but that such scrutiny is inevitable.

The early results of AIM's 2007 corporate election proxy voting records appear to indicate the changes have made a real and significant difference. Of the roughly 1,000 votes AIM cast, it voted against management recommendations at least once 45% of the time, and against all of management recommendations, 15% of the time.

"There was a sense that the process was routine as opposed to being vigilant," Bruce Crockett, chairman of the AIM Funds board told The Wall Street Journal.

"There was also concern that shareholders were becoming more vigilant about corporate governance, so something had to be done. The policies needed to be completely reworked from top to bottom," added Donna Anderson, chairwoman of the proxy voting committee.

As a result of the changes, AIM is now scrutinizing severance packages and executive pay more closely and voting more often against staggered boards as opposed to voting in completely new slates every year.

The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, in conjunction with The Corporate Library, examined the 2006 proxy voting records on executive pay measures for 29 mutual fund families and concluded that AIM, AllianceBernstein and Barclays Global Investors were "pay enablers." The study found that while the fund companies voted in favor of management-proposed executive compensation recommendations 74% of the time-AIM voted in support of such proposals 91.1% of the time.

We've said it before and we'll undoubtedly say it again: The day of proxy vote reckoning has finally come.

(c) 2007 Money Management Executive and SourceMedia, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

http://www.mmexecutive.com http://www.sourcemedia.com

Recent Posts

Mutual Funds Must Go High-Tech-v. 3.0

Over the last number of years, mutual fund transfer agencies and shareholder communications companies have tried to convince shareholders to accept paperless summary prospectuses, proxies, trade confirmations and electronically stamped signatures. Fund supermarkets and web home pages have broadened their horizons to include market commentary, videostreaming and personal financial news. At the same time, exchange-traded funds, funds-of-funds, hedge FoFs, unified managed accounts, target dates, 401(k) auto enrollment and heightened awareness among people throughout the country of the difficulties of being retired-have taken off.

Test of the Massey Mine

Fund giant boards of directors at AllianceBernstein, American Funds, Fidelity, Vanguard and others are reportedly starting to bring about meaningful change in the corporations in which they are invested. Proof should come any day now, when the shareholder proxy votes from the annual meetings are released. Fund chief executive officers spoke about the power and influence their proxies wield in an interesting Reuters article last week, "Mutual Funds Seek to Shed 'Rubber Stamp' Tag."

Milestones

In 2011, 401(k) plans will turn 30, but the milestones the mutual fund industry has reached in this time are but a nanosecond in the history of U.S. retirement policy. Executives we interviewed for this special edition of Money Management Executive for the Investment Company Institute's meeting in Washington, speak to important milestones of the recent past and into the future. Look inside for observations and forecasts by Ted Benna, Robert L. Reynolds, Dan Fuss, David C. John, Steven Miyao and others.

At Age 30, It's Time for a Revamping for the 401(k)

This year marks the 30th anniversary of the 401(k), the revolutionary retirement savings vehicle that has been annihilating pension plans, empowering individuals to take part in the stock market-and, sadly, that left retirees with the misfortune of leaving the workforce in 2000 or 2008 very badly off. The cracks in the system are prompting many asset managers, regulators and retirement experts to take a hard look at 401(k)s and how they can be fixed.

Index of Posts

0 Comments

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Money Management Executive, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

Not Registered?

You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.