FREE Site Registration!
Sign up today and take advantage of member-only content — the kind of timely, cutting edge industry insight that only Money Management Executive can deliver.

FREE site registration entitles you to:

Exclusive Online Only Content

Free Daily Email News Alerts

Industry White Papers

Asset Management Blogs

   

Retire Rich

By Lee Barney, MMExecutive

September 17, 2007

New Criticism of Lifecycle Funds Aims at Inflexibility

Lifecycle funds are now taking another punch, and while this one may not be fully merited, it is one that fund companies might want to consider as a roadmap to improving such funds' performance and marketability.

First, it was that lifecycle, or target-date, funds were too conservative in their equity/fixed income allocations and would not be able to provide retirees with adequate income to last as long as 20 or 30 years.

Fund companies responded, nearly unilaterally, by increasing U.S. and international equity holdings in target-date funds, even in income funds created specifically for those in retirement.

Then, apparently in their quest to differentiate their lifecycle funds from competitors and attract more assets, fund companies pushed the envelope even further and began packing them with alternative investments, such as real estate, commodities and emerging markets. This was met with yet another wave of spirited criticism, this time charging that lifecycle funds were becoming too risky.

Now a third wave of criticism has emerged, and to fund companies' credit, I'm not sure it's fully merited, although it is something they may want to take into consideration-particularly as a differentiating factor that fund companies can use to boost lifecycle funds' performance and position them differently from competitors.

According to a report from an investment strategy think tank called the Compass Institute, lifecycle funds are too inflexible because they adhere to projected market forecasts without taking economic developments and current market conditions into consideration. Now, that's not entirely true. Portfolio managers do oversee target-date funds and, typically, reallocate their portfolio holdings every quarter. However, perhaps target-date funds could be more actively managed and respond more nimbly to market conditions.

The Compass Institute studied the results of target-date and other formulaic asset allocation funds-such as balanced funds, managed accounts and funds that use Monte Carlo simulation-over the past 10 years and found that the worst-performing funds delivered average annual returns of 6.9%. On the high end, they rose an average of 8.8% a year.

By comparison, asset allocation funds with an adaptive mandate rose an average of 14.1% a year.

(c) 2007 Money Management Executive and SourceMedia, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

http://www.mmexecutive.com http://www.sourcemedia.com

Recent Posts

Salutations Where Salutations Are Due

The mood at this year's General Membership Meeting of the Investment Company Institute was decidedly upbeat. For good reason. The industry is doing well, having grown net assets by 7% in 2007 and, largely, evading the subprime credit crisis. As well, mutual fund executives, starting with ICI President Paul Schott Stevens, spoke of the industry's vital importance to the American invsetor and our collective and individual fiduciary duties to them.

Add Forensic Testing to the SEC Exam Checklist

At the Securities and Exchange Commission's meeting on April 17 and 18 in Washington, D.C., open only to chief compliance officers, SEC chief examiner Gene Gohlke announced that mutual funds can now add forensic testing to their SEC exam checklist of funds' own annual internal compliance reviews. If an asset management firm has not conducted forensic testing, it runs the risk of being found deficient.

Index of Posts

Post a Comment

You must be registered and logged in to post a comment. Click here to register.

Reader Comments

Be the first to comment.

Lee Barney

Lee Barney has been writing about Wall Street since 1993, the past six years as editor of Money Management Executive and Retirement Income Reporter. Previously, at United Media’s Wall Street & Technology magazine and Risk/Waters Information Services, she covered financial IT. For TheStreet.com, she wrote the daily “Meet the Street” column covering a broad spectrum of market-moving events. Lee began her career as a reporter in Tokyo with The Japan Times and was executive editor of Spotlight magazine.

Related Items