Sign up today and take advantage of member-only content — the kind of timely, cutting edge industry insight that only Money Management Executive can deliver.
  • Exclusive Online Only Content
  • Free Daily Email News Alerts
  • Asset Management Blogs

What MF Global Should Teach Fund Managers

Your collateral is only as safe as your futures trader's risk management system.

That's the key lesson fund managers should learn when it comes to the surprise demise of brokerage firm and futures commission merchant MF Global, said Andrew Cross, a partner with the law firm of Reed Smith of Pittsburgh, which is representing creditors caught in the collapse.

MF Global made costly multibillion-dollar bets on European government bonds. That was risky-and when its gamble didn't pan out, it filed for bankruptcy on Oct. 31. The filing is considered the eighth-largest in U.S. history and prompted Jon Corzine, the former co-chief executive officer of Goldman Sachs Group Inc. to resign as MF Global's CEO on Nov. 4.

The CME Group has moved the trading positions of fund managers and a portion of the margin held by a clearinghouse it operates for futures transactions to new futures commission merchants: ABN Amro Clearing Chicago, ADM Investor services, Dorman Trading, FCStone, R.J. O'Brien and Rosenthal Collins Group.

The operative word is portion.

That means not all. Some of the initial margin on deposit with the clearinghouse has been retained by CME.

Meanwhile, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and other regulatory agencies are trying to figure out just what happened to what MF Global's trustee says is a $1.2 billion "shortfall" in customer property that was supposed to be segregated from MF Global's own money.

At press time, trustee James Giddens was set to appear in a New York court to figure out how to deal with the "bulk transfer and distribution" of about $2.1 billion in customer assets. That figure is supposed to restore about two-thirds or more of the collateral to customers of MF Global which used the firm to clear their futures contracts. The process is similar to what occurred in 2005 to Refco, which collapsed in a fraud scandal. Further details on MF Global's proceedings can be found at

Futures commission merchants-futures traders-such as MF Global, are members of clearinghouses. A clearinghouse guarantees that the parties to a futures contract will perform their obligations by, as often repeated, becoming the buyer to every seller and the seller to every buyer. Only qualified members are permitted to keep a trading account at the clearinghouse. Non-clearing member market participants must open an account with a clearing member to trade cleared products.

In the world of futures trading, that clearing member is called a futures commission merchant or FCM.

Clearing members-such as MF Global-place collateral on deposit when they accept orders from customers. The fund manager clients of clearing member post funds to firms such as MF Global.

All of the margin a clearing agent collects from its customers must be kept in an account that is segregated from the FCM's own property. By many accounts, MF Global didn't always do that and it used some funds to meet its own financial obligations. The $1.2 billion represents an estimated 22% of all the collateral that should have been segregated.

"In the futures market, the clearing member must maintain a sufficient level of capital, contribute to a guarantee fund maintained by the clearinghouse to backstop its obligations to the market, and to collect a specified amount of initial and variation margin in support of trades entered into by the customers of that clearing member," Cross said.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission regulates any market participant that collects initial margin from customers as an FCM.

If a clearing member defaults on its obligations to the clearinghouse, then the clearinghouse has a right to be made whole. If an FCM goes bust and owes money to the clearinghouse, then the clearinghouse first uses the defaulting FCM's assets to meet any obligations owed by that member to the clearinghouse.

If the FCM's assets are not sufficient, then the initial margin posted by the failed FCM's customers is next in line. The CME has not disclosed whether it will follow what is commonly called a waterfall approach to divvying up the collateral posted by the failed FCM's customers. A "waterfall" shows whose collateral a clearinghouse such as CME plans to tap first and then the sequence and expected amounts after that.

MF Global's demise and the search for customer funds poses the question: Could fund managers have figured out sooner that their assets were not segregated?

It's unlikely, according to Cross. Two other securities law experts contacted by Money Management Executive, who declined to be named, agreed.

"Under current regulations, the collateral posted by a fund manager to futures commission merchant is commingled with the collateral of other fund manager clients and that collateral is usually posted with a clearinghouse in an omnibus account," Cross explained. "All the fund manager sees on its statements is its share of the total collateral in the omnibus account."