Sign up today and take advantage of member-only content — the kind of timely, cutting edge industry insight that only Money Management Executive can deliver.
  • Exclusive Online Only Content
  • Free Daily Email News Alerts
  • Asset Management Blogs

SEC Allows Fund Boards to Set Timing Curbs: Brokers to be Held Liable Under New Contracts


The Securities and Exchange Commission Thursday approved a new rule to combat market timing that would leave the decision to impose redemption fees on mutual funds up to the board of directors and allow funds to hold intermediaries more accountable for abusive trading.

In a unanimous decision, all five SEC commissioners voted to approve a more flexible version of a proposal floated last year that sought to stamp out rapid short-term trading. The original proposal called for funds to impose a mandatory 2% redemption fee on shares sold within five days of purchase. According to the Commission, 85% of the 400 comment letters it received opposed mandatory redemption fees.

Under the revised rule, funds may impose a redemption fee of up to 2% on shares redeemed within seven days of purchase but are not required to do so. The rule excludes money market funds and exchange-traded funds from the equation as well as funds that encourage active trading and disclose to investors in the prospectus its financial impact on the fund. At present, roughly 10% of all mutual funds carry redemption fees.

The move comes as part of the SEC's robust regulatory agenda in the wake of a pervasive trading scandal that roiled the $8 trillion industry.

"Redemption fees are not really susceptible to a one-size-fits-all approach," said SEC Chairman William Donaldson, at an open meeting. "They are not costless to implement, and it is not easy to structure them in a way that captures all of the activity we are trying to deter and none of the activity we aren't. Moreover, funds are not equally vulnerable."

"The less restrictive, more flexible alternative that we have today is worth trying, although I think we'll have to keep our eye on it to see if it's working," said Democratic Commissioner Harvey Goldschmid. Commissioner Cynthia Glassman, a Republican who opposed the first draft of the rule, characterized the revision as "a measured response." She also urged the division of investment management to finish its fair-value pricing guidance, identifying it as the primary method of stamping out market timing.

Paul Atkins, a Republican, cautioned that although fund boards have the discretion to choose an appropriate redemption fee amount, there is a danger that the 2% cap will become the default level in the industry. He said that if this leads to fund shareholders being charged excessive fees, he would make referrals to the enforcement division himself.

As stipulated by the rule, fund boards will be asked to determine on a fund-by-fund basis whether there is a market-timing issue by looking at flow data and relevant trading information. If market timing exists, the fund can delay or restrict trading activity, redeem shares in kind or send in their internal market-timing police squad to investigate. However, these efforts can be costly, so it is up to the board and the chief compliance officer to decide whether or not a fund warrants a redemption fee based on the level of activity.

Another tenet laid out in the anti-market timing provision is a requirement that funds negotiate written contracts with their intermediaries obligating them to hand over shareholder trading information. The data provided by brokers and retirement plan administrators will help funds identify customers who trade through omnibus accounts and oversee intermediaries' assessment of redemption fees when shareholders violate market-timing policies.

The SEC estimated the cost of setting up systems for intermediaries to do their due diligence at $630 million over three years, after which only an ongoing maintenance fee would apply. The original rule proposal would have cost funds and intermediaries $1 billion, but the revision lowered costs due to the shift to a fee system based on fund demand.

The intermediaries handling portfolio transactions for multiple funds in multiple fund complexes have complained that they struggle to levy redemption fees when up against a potentially unlimited combination of variables.

While confident that the benefits of the voluntary redemption fee approach outweigh the mandatory approach, the SEC expressed concern that the fund intermediaries may not cooperate adequately by refusing to impose redemption fees on shareholders that own shares through omnibus accounts. Historically, intermediaries have been "unwilling to affect this issue," Goldschmid noted.

To address that concern, the commissioners decided to reopen the comment period to hear recommendations on how to streamline the "design elements" of redemption fees in an effort to pare implementation costs.

Paul Roye, outgoing director of the SEC's division of investment management, suggested as a possible solution that those funds that opted to impose a redemption fee adhere to certain parameters. "We believe that a uniform standard would decrease intermediaries' costs of imposing redemption fees, and therefore encourage more intermediaries to assess them," Roye said.