Sign up today and take advantage of member-only content — the kind of timely, cutting edge industry insight that only Money Management Executive can deliver.
  • Exclusive Online Only Content
  • Free Daily Email News Alerts
  • Asset Management Blogs

NAVA To Boomers, Brokers: Get Real': Calls for Focus on Retirement Income Solutions

NEW YORK - Financial advisers and brokers need to partner with carriers, Congress and regulators to provide appropriately tailored retirement solutions, inclusive of annuities, for the nation's 77 million Boomers.

Mark J. Mackey, president and chief executive officer of the National Association for Variable Annuities, Reston, Va., made this these opening remark at NAVA's annual annuity seminar here last month. Joining Mackey in stating the case for annuities' role in retirement planning were Glenn Schafer, vice chairman, PacificLife, Newport Beach, Calif., and Timothy C. Pfeifer, principal and actuary with Milliman USA, Chicago. (Congressman Jim McCrery (R-La.), chairman of the House Ways and Means subcommittee on Social Security, was scheduled to appear but was called into a committee meeting.)

Referring to the pending wave of Baby Boomers, the eldest of whom are turning 59-1/2 this year, Mackey called this upcoming retirement wave - combined with "financial illiteracy, increasing longevity long past 85" and the pending crises of Social Security and Medicare - "the perfect storm."

Although some unscrupulous brokers and advisors have sold annuities inappropriately, Mackey and the other speakers maintained that there is a bonafide use for annuities in an investor's retirement portfolio to supplement income.

An annuity is a long-term retirement investment vehicle combining insurance benefits, guaranteed lifetime income payments and tax-deferred savings. Secondarily, today's variable annuities offer greater liquidity, flexibility and a broader range of features than in the past, providing more options and opportunities for retired Americans.

Mackey pointed out that many retirees are living longer, more active lifestyles than previous generations, and therefore can still be considered long-term investors entering retirement.

Flouting Numbers

Among other widely debated tenets in the defined contribution industry, Mackey discussed "rules of thumb" on how much a person should save for retirement, basing his comments on research by AON Consulting.

"Assume you will need 100% of income, if you want to maintain your standard of living in retirement," he said. Even if that isn't an individual's goal, Mackey continued, "at a rate of 3.5% annually, inflation could reduce a retiree's purchasing power over the years by as much as 50%."

While retirement calculators at leading mutual fund and brokerage Web sites vary widely in terms of their savings guidance, Mackey suggested that a person should plan on being retired for at least 20 years. For a person earning $30,000 a year, for example, that means they should strive for a $600,000 nest egg.

And should a senior citizen be hit by an illness, "a $500,000 nest egg could quickly become $300,000," Schafer added.

(c) 2005 Money Management Executive and SourceMedia, Inc. All Rights Reserved.