Pitched Debate Looms Over Pension Reform: Legislation Includes Key Provision for Retail Fund Industry
December 12, 2005
Lawmakers in Washington this week are expected to tackle a key piece of pension reform legislation, known as the Pension Protection Act of 2005, which could significantly impact the financial services industry.
Experts say that unlike Social Security reform, which appears to have finally met its death within the current administration because of President Bush's controversial private accounts, some sort of a pension reform plan could actually see the light of day by early next year.
That's mostly because, much like the impending insolvency that faces Social Security, the foundation of the nation's pension system is badly distressed.
According to the Federal government's latest figures, the U.S. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. (PBGC), which is the insurer of corporate plans, has been running a $23 billion deficit since taking over the plans of United Airlines and U.S. Airways. If another major corporation with a big pension obligation files for bankruptcy, PBGC could fall even further into the red. Analysts have a grim outlook for struggling automaker General Motors, and bankrupt Northwest Airlines has said it's unsure if it can meet its funding requirements. Thus, lawmakers are hoping to curb that risk by enhancing pension funding and adding new sources of pension revenue, and they'd like to get the lion's share of the work completed before the next holiday break.
"It's not a question of whether they'll take up pension reform, it's more of a question of when," said Leslie Kramerich, who closely follows pension and tax issues from the government affairs office of the Investment Company Institute in Washington. "If it isn't this week, we hope it will be the first item on the agenda when Congress resumes next year. This is one of those legs of the retirement stool that people would like to see strengthened."
The final pension reform package, however, will surely come only after a pitched battle on Capitol Hill over the next two weeks, with corporate America on one side and the nation's unions on the other side.
The current trend among many large corporations is to dump traditional pension plans because they're too costly. New York telecommunications giant Verizon did just that a few days ago and expects the move will save the company $3 billion over the next 10 years. It plans to expand its employees' 401(k) plans instead.
"This restructuring reflects the realities of our changing world," said Verizon CEO Ivan Seidenberg. "Companies today, including many we compete with, are not implementing defined benefit pension plans."
But a number of powerful Washington lobbies, like the 2.7 million-member National Education Association and the 16.1 million-strong AFL-CIO, steadfastly oppose changes to pension benefits that might ease the funding pressure many corporations currently face. They fear for the demise of the old-fashioned, rock-solid pensions guaranteed under union contracts and the rise of more cash balance plans that incorporate 401(k)s.
"We are deeply concerned by the [Pension Protection Act's] sweeping changes to the private pension rules and its severe impact on the retirement security of millions of American workers," said William Samuel, director of the AFL-CIO's department of legislation in a recent letter to House Ways and Means Chairman Bill Thomas (R-Calif.).
And while on the surface, the nation's defined benefit plan system seems to have very little bearing on the retail side of the money management industry, experts say pension reform would simply allow everyday Americans to put more money into retirement savings products.
Steve Bartlett, president and CEO of The Financial Services Roundtable, a Washington lobbyist for the money management industry, is urging the House of Representatives to act as quickly as possible on the Pension Protection Act because "pension reform will strengthen the ability of Americans to save and invest for retirement," he wrote in a letter to House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.). "The time to act is sooner, rather than later."
But the bill under debate in the House - the Senate has already passed its version of pension reform and it isn't nearly as friendly to the industry - contains several provisions that carry more specific implications to the retail side of the business.
For starters, the Pension Protection Act would make permanent the higher annual contribution limits for IRAs and qualified pension plans, including the catch-up provisions for individuals age 50 and older. Enacted under the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, those measures are scheduled to sunset in 2010.
Another provision would encourage employers to offer automatic enrollment in qualified retirement plans. Currently, most workers must choose to participate in a plan. Automatic enrollment would enroll them in a default plan unless they choose not to participate. Some recent studies have shown that employee participation in qualified retirement plans increases when automatic enrollment is offered.