Spitzer Sues J.W. Seligman For Rampant' Timing
October 2, 2006
New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer filed a lawsuit against J.W. Seligman and its president, Brian Zino, on Tuesday in New York Supreme Court, charging the company with entering into "rampant" market-timing arrangements.
The suit also names Seligman's fund distributor and shareholder services agent and seeks injunctive relief, disgorgement of fees and profits, restitution and penalties.
Last year, Seligman disputed Spitzer's charges that extensive market timing occurred at the company, saying that it had uncovered only four instances of such activity and that they cost investors $2 million.
Spitzer followed up with a court order requiring Seligman to provide documents and make employees available for deposition, from which he uncovered 35 additional market-timing agreements, one of which permitted an investor to conduct 400 market-timing trades in six Seligman funds.
"While it is certainly within a company's rights to continue to contest the evidence, the record shows that there was a clear breach of fiduciary duty at Seligman," Spitzer said.
Spitzer found that the four instances of market timing occurred between 2001 and 2003. Once Spitzer obtained records dating back to 1998, he uncovered the additional agreements, calling the company's internal investigation disingenuous because it focused on a conveniently limited time frame.
Spitzer also said a number of Seligman's senior managers were aware of the timing and its harmful effect on investors.
(c) 2006 Money Management Executive and SourceMedia, Inc. All Rights Reserved.